THIS WEBSITE IS PRIVILEGED UNDER CCP 47(B) AND PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
THIS WEBSITE IS PRIVILEGED UNDER CCP 47(B) AND PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Get instant access to the first amended complaint v. The State Bar of California in PDF, plus occasional updates by email reserved for subscribers only.
According to the California State Auditor, “An attorney licensed to practice law in California and in another state was suspended in the other state in 2007. The attorney did not notify the State Bar of the suspension within the statutory 30-day deadline and, in 2008, let their California license become inactive. When seeking to become active again in 2021, the attorney informed the State Bar of the 2007 discipline. The State Bar might have readmitted the attorney without considering the past misconduct if the attorney had not shared this information. As of February 2022, the State Bar is considering potential discipline of the attorney for the misconduct in the other state and for failing to disclose the past misconduct to the State Bar.”
Why doesn't The State Bar of California monitor discipline in other jurisdictions when so much is at stake?
Copyright © 2023 Stop Corrupt Lawyers - All Rights Reserved.
3501 Roselle St. Oceanside CA 92056 -- justin@stopcorruptlawyers.com
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.