THIS WEBSITE IS PRIVILEGED UNDER CCP 47(B) AND PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
THIS WEBSITE IS PRIVILEGED UNDER CCP 47(B) AND PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Get instant access to the first amended complaint v. The State Bar of California in PDF, plus occasional updates by email reserved for subscribers only.
According to the California State Auditor, “An attorney was the subject of 28 complaints over a five-year period, one of which was initiated after a bank notified the State Bar that the attorney failed to maintain funds that were received for a client in a client trust account. Over this period, 10 of the 28 complaints involving the attorney alleged client trust account violations. At the time the State Bar reviewed the violation reported by the bank, the attorney had two other disciplinary matters open, one of which alleged a client trust account violation. Although State Bar intake staff noted the open investigations in their review of the violation reported by the bank, they did not forward the complaint to be investigated by the staff who were investigating the other open complaints. Instead, the State Bar closed the complaint as de minimis.”
How would you feel if your money was taken from an attorney -- and The State Bar of California considered your money "de minimis?"
Help us stop The State Bar of California from enabling this now and forever.
Copyright © 2023 Stop Corrupt Lawyers - All Rights Reserved.
3501 Roselle St. Oceanside CA 92056 -- justin@stopcorruptlawyers.com
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.