THIS WEBSITE IS PRIVILEGED UNDER CCP 47(B) AND PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
THIS WEBSITE IS PRIVILEGED UNDER CCP 47(B) AND PROTECTED BY THE US CONSTITUTION
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Get instant access to the first amended complaint v. The State Bar of California in PDF, plus occasional updates by email reserved for subscribers only.
According to the California State Auditor, “To explain two overdrafts of a client trust account that occurred in a particular month, an attorney submitted a copy of the account’s bank statement for the prior month, but not for the month when the client trust account was actually overdrawn. Instead, the attorney submitted a narrative providing details of certain transactions for the month in question and then asserted that the overdraft was caused by charges the attorney expected would be paid from a different account. Instead of requesting the bank statement for the month in question, the State Bar accepted the attorney’s explanation and closed the case.”
What did The State Bar of California do to help the clients whose funds may have been stolen?
Help us stop The State Bar of California from enabling this now and forever.
Copyright © 2023 Stop Corrupt Lawyers - All Rights Reserved.
3501 Roselle St. Oceanside CA 92056 -- justin@stopcorruptlawyers.com
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.